Gov. Chris Sununu’s plan in his budget to consolidate the University System and the Community College System is supported by one body, but not the other.
The Senate Finance Committee heard both sides on Tuesday afternoon, including new details about an alternative model presented by the Community College System.
Catherine Provencher, chief administrative officer of the University System of New Hampshire, said a merger would be a tool to address the changes and future headwinds coming in to play with fewer students expected in the pipeline and the need to keep tuition manageable.
The state planning office estimates that the number of 15- to 19-year-olds in the state in five years will be 5,000 fewer and that students will likely be more financially needy. She said USNH is not asking for an increase in either tuition or state funding for the next biennium, but it is looking to pare its costs.
To deal with a $70 million cost restructuring that looks to future challenges, she said a record of almost 500 employees have taken early retirement or voluntary separation.
“It’s absolutely unprecedented,” Provencher said of so many deciding to leave. Still, enrollment for next fall looks to be holding steady.
Provencher said the merger could help “bring costs down” particularly in administration, where she says cuts are “necessary.” She also said it would be another tool in the toolbox to address changes.
Dr. Susan Huard, chancellor of the Community College System of NH (CCSNH), called her system a bit different than USNH with different needs.
Huard said they, too, will see a decline in students with fewer in the pipeline, but it is not likely to impact the Community College System as much.
For the first time in the merger discussions, Huard detailed an alternative model, including the following:
“Some states, including Maine, established an ongoing Higher Education Coordinating Council for the public systems. Such an entity comprised of leaders of both systems could be accountable for:
1. Building and enhancing clear student transfer pathways, with required progress/milestones to be met;
2. Developing operating and capital budget requests that are complementary, not competitive;
3. Deepening present work on synergies such as procurement, contracts, IT, real estate, etc.;
4. Coordinating in other areas of planning and service, such as state business attraction efforts;
5. Reporting regularly to the Public Higher Education Study Committee, and to the Governor.
In a state with similar demographic trends, this approach honors the systems’ differing missions, student needs, local impacts, and operating structures while creating a formal vehicle for accountability and collaboration.”
There are about 26,000 mostly NH residents who attend seven community colleges in 12 locations (including one in each county), which offer certificates and short-term training programs and allow for people to acquire college credits, many while they are working. Some students also use CCSNH as a more affordable step toward a four-year degree as credits are largely transferable.
Huard said the system has good enrollment rates and is “agile,” putting up new programs and tremoving programs not in demand fairly quickly.
“Our position and our board’s position is different,” than USNH's stance “and there are many questions before we go down that path,” Huard said of the merger.
She said it would be best to work as partners, adding the Community College System works to give its students, many of modest means, a “top benefit on every dollar they invest in us,” and noted it is level-funding tuition for the next biennium.
At least 78% of CCSNH students stay in NH to work and attending a community college creates upward mobility to better-paying jobs and transferability of credits, she said.
The CCSNH system is looking for about $36 million a year in the general fund while USNH is looking for about $88 million that largely subsidizes in-state tuition. Rather than paying $36,000 a year as out-of-state students do, NH students pay about $18,000.
See both presentations here: